Share on

Unequal effects of the national lockdown on mental and social health in Italy

Authors

Abstract

With the exception of a few countries that chose a different approach, the worldwide
reaction to the COVID-19 pandemic was a (longer or shorter) period of national lockdown.
While the economic consequences of shutting down national economies were immediately
evident, the sociopsychiatric implications of the social confinement of the entire
population remain hidden and not fully understood. Italy has been the first European
country to be severely impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic, to which it responded
through strict lockdown measurements. The results of a timely survey on mental and social
health, carried out by students and teachers of a middle school in Rome, might help
identify the most vulnerable groups of the population. This evidence could be crucial in
conceiving and enacting targeted public health policies to mitigate the consequences of
the pandemic on mental health and to prevent intolerance to containment measures in
some population segments, which could hamper worldwide efforts in the fight against
COVID-19.

References

  1. CNBC: Dr. Anthony Fauci says the average age of U.S. coronavirus patients has dropped by 15 years as Sun Belt states gets hit, July 2020, https://www.cnbc.com/2020/07/06/dr-anthony-fauci-says-the-average-age-of-us-coronavirus-patients-has-dropped-by-15-years-as-sun-belt-states-gets-hit.html
  2. COVID-19 integrated surveillance: key national data, Istituto Superiore di Sanità, https://www.epicentro.iss.it/en/coronavirus/sars-cov-2-integrated-surveillance-data
  3. Eshel, N., Nelson, E., Blair, R.J., Pine D.S., Ernst M. Neural substrates of choice selection in adults and adolescents: development of ventrolateral prefrontal and anterior cingulate cortices. Neuropsychologia, 2007, 45, 1270–1279, doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2006.10.004.
  4. Greene, K. The theory of active involvement: Processes underlying interventions that engage adolescents in message planning and/or production. Health Communication, 2013, 28(7), 644-656, doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2012.762824.
  5. Ingalhalikar M., et al. Sex differences in the structural connectome of the human brain. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2014, 111(2), 823–828, doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1316909110.
  6. Joel, D., Berman, Z., Tavor, I., Wexler, N., Gaber, O., Stein, Y.,Margulies, D. S. Sex beyond the genitalia: The human brain mosaic. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2015, 112(50), 15468–15473, doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1509654112.
  7. Knoll, L. J., Leung, J. T., Foulkes, L., Blakemore, S.-J. Age-related differences in social influence on risk perception depend on the direction of influence. Journal of Adolescence, 2017, 60, 53–63, doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2017.07.002.
  8. Langer, A., et al. Women and health: the key for sustainable development. The Lancet, 2015, 386(9999), 1165–1210, doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(15)60497-4.
  9. Matud, M. P. Gender differences in stress and coping styles. Personality and Individual Differences, 2004, 37(7), 1401–1415, doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2004.01.010.
  10. Murray, S. L. Fear and the Front Line. New England Journal of Medicine, 2020, 382(19), 1784–1785, doi.org/10.1056/NEJMp2003868.
  11. Myers, K. R., et al. Unequal effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on scientists. Nature Human Behaviour, 2020, 1–4, doi.org/10.1038/s41562-020-0921-y.
  12. Nelson, E. E., Leibenluft, E., McClure, E. B., Pine, D. S. The social re-orientation of adolescence: a neuroscience perspective on the process and its relation to psychopathology. Psychological Medicine, 2005, 35(2), 163, doi.org/10.1017/S0033291704003915.
  13. Powell K. How does teenage brain work? Science, 2006; 442:865–867, doi.org/10.1038/442865a.
  14. Steinberg, L. Risk taking in adolescence: What changes, and why? Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 2004, 1021, 51–58, 10.1196/annals.1308.005.
  15. UN Secretary-General’s policy brief: The impact of COVID-19 on women, 2020, https://www.unwomen.org/en/digital-library/publications/2020/04/policy-brief-the-impact-of-covid-19-on-women
  16. Verma, R., Balhara, Y. P. S., Gupta, C. S. Gender differences in stress response: Role of developmental and biological determinants. Industrial Psychiatry Journal, 2001, 20(1), 4–10, 10.4103/0972-6748.98407.
  17. World Economic Forum. The global gender gap report 2016, http://www3.weforum.org/docs/GGGR16/WEF_Global_Gender_Gap_Report_2016.pdf
  18. World Health Organization, Key Messages and Actions for COVID-19 Prevention and Control in Schools, March 2020.

Downloads

Authors

Emanuele Caroppo - Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore

Pietro De Lellis - University of Naples Federico II

Ilaria Lega - Istituto Superiore della Sanità

Antonella Candelori - Scuola Media Michelangelo Buonarroti

Daniela Pedacchia - Scuola Media Michelangelo Buonarroti

Alida Pellegrini

Rossella Sonnino - Scuola Media Michelangelo Buonarroti

Virginia Venturiello - Scuola Media Michelangelo Buonarroti

Manuel Ruiz Marín - Universidad Politecnica de Cartagena

Maurizio Porfiri - New York University

How to Cite
Caroppo, E., De Lellis, P., Lega, I., Candelori, A., Pedacchia, D., Pellegrini, A. ., Sonnino, R., Venturiello, V., Ruiz Marín, M., & Porfiri, M. (2020). Unequal effects of the national lockdown on mental and social health in Italy. Annali dell’Istituto Superiore Di Sanità, 56(4), 497–501. Retrieved from https://annali.iss.it/index.php/anna/article/view/1183
  • Abstract viewed - 331 times
  • PDF downloaded - 541 times