Share on

Lymphedema and psychosocial well-being: a mixed-methods exploration of resources and challenges in the Italian context

Authors

Abstract

Introduction. Individuals affected by lymphedema, both primary and secondary, experience a significant reduction in quality of life and functional capacity. However, the impact of lymphedema on occupational life, specifically on return-to-work processes, remains largely unexplored.
Objectives. This study explores the psychosocial, occupational, and health-related challenges experienced by individuals with lymphedema, with a focus on work reintegration.
Methods. A mixed-method approach was adopted through the development of an online survey, which included both standardized psychometric scales and open-ended questions.
Results. The mediation analysis confirmed that return to work self-efficacy serves as a key mechanism through which optimism contributes to job satisfaction. Qualitative findings highlight the need for multilevel and systemic interventions. From an individual perspective, targeted self-efficacy training programs for workers with lymphedema appear crucial.
Conclusions. Considering a community and an organizational perspective, it is essential to implement training initiatives for healthcare professionals aimed at improving their knowledge and awareness of lymphedema.

Downloads

Authors

Stefania Fantinelli - Department of Theoretical and Applied Sciences, University eCampus, Roma

Teresa Galanti - G. d'Annunzio University of Chieti-Pescara

Michela Cortini - Department of Psychology, G. d'Annunzio University of Chieti-Pescara

Pierluigi Zolesio - Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Specialist, formerly Università degli Studi di Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy

Chiara Buldrini - Department of Biomedical, Surgical and Dental Sciences, University of Milan, Milan.

How to Cite
Fantinelli, S., Galanti, T., Cortini, M., Zolesio, P., & Buldrini, C. (2025). Lymphedema and psychosocial well-being: a mixed-methods exploration of resources and challenges in the Italian context. Annali dell’Istituto Superiore Di Sanità, 61(4), 285–292. https://doi.org/10.4415/ANN_25_04_07
  • Abstract viewed - 130 times
  • pdf downloaded - 48 times