Validation of the Italian version of the Apathy Evaluation Scale (AES-I) in institutionalized geriatric patients



Objectives: Apathy is a very common symptom in institutionalized elderly and represents a condition of both clinical and public health importance. The Apathy Evaluation Scale (AES) has been shown to be a valid and reliable tool for characterizing, quantifying and differentiating apathy in various health conditions. The aims of this study were to establish the validity and reliability of the Italian version of the AES, and to assess the severity of apathy in a sample of Italian institutionalized geriatric patients.

Method: Data were collected from clinical interviews using the AES informant version (AES-I). Associations between measures of apathy and depression, cognitive functioning and perceived quality of life were evaluated, as well as the effect of the living environment on apathetic symptoms.

Results: Multiple forms of reliability and validity (i.e. test-retest, internal consistency, discriminability of apathy rating from a standard measure of depression) were satisfied. Our results also show that the characteristics of the care setting may affect the severity of apathetic symptoms.

Conclusions: The AES-I Italian version is a reliable and valid instrument for measuring apathy in Italian patients, also allowing a direct comparison with data gathered in other countries. 

Share on



Marta Borgi - Istituto Superiore di Sanità

Floriana Caccamo - Università degli Studi di Padova

Alessandro Giuliani - Istituto Superiore di Sanità

Alessandro Piergentili - Giomi RSA s.r.l.

Sonia Sessa - Giomi RSA s.r.l.

Emilia Reda - Giomi RSA s.r.l.

Enrico Alleva - Istituto Superiore di Sanità

Francesca Cirulli - Istituto Superiore di Sanità

Fabio Miraglia - Giomi RSA s.r.l.

How to Cite
Borgi, M., Caccamo, F., Giuliani, A., Piergentili, A., Sessa, S., Reda, E., … Miraglia, F. (2016). Validation of the Italian version of the Apathy Evaluation Scale (AES-I) in institutionalized geriatric patients. Annali dell’Istituto Superiore Di Sanità, 52(2), 249–255. Retrieved from
  • Abstract viewed - 772 times